Rowenta RO8049
| Caractéristiques | |||
| Bag? | no | ||
| Weight without accessories | 7 kg | ||
| Noise level | 73 dB | ||
| Filter type | |||
| Suction | 29 kPa | ||
Show all specifications
|
|||
| Airflow | 35 dm3/s |
| Electricity consumption | 2100 W |
| N.A. | |
| Bin capacity | 2 L |
| Range | 9 m |
| Guarantee | 1 year(s) |
Hide specifications | |
Vincent Alzieu
Test date: May 11, 2010
Test date: May 11, 2010
Running Costs

With 1860 W of power at the wall, you'll add a pound to your electricity bill every four hours, but you can get 5 hours 15 minutes out of a more efficient 1400 W model.
Hoovering with the RO8049 is the equivalent of turning on nineteen 40'' TVs at the same time.
More realistically, using the RO8049 for twenty minutes twice a week will cost around £10 in electricity over the course of a year, compared to £6.50 from a more efficient 1400 W vacuum cleaner.
Hoovering with the RO8049 is the equivalent of turning on nineteen 40'' TVs at the same time.
More realistically, using the RO8049 for twenty minutes twice a week will cost around £10 in electricity over the course of a year, compared to £6.50 from a more efficient 1400 W vacuum cleaner.
Rowenta pitches its Silence Force Cyclonic RO8049 as an ultra-powerful, ultra-quiet vacuum cleaner with the added advantage of a self-cleaning filter.
The manufacturer claims that this excellent performance is due to a suction power of 29 kPa, cyclonic technology, a motor that is four times quieter than the competition and a huge energy consumption of 2100 Watts. The one thing we know for certain is that turning it on will send the electricity bill sky-high, but does it do the job?
Ease of use
The RO8049 is very easy to use, made up of a single unit with big buttons. The finish is impeccable, and the different parts clip together well with a reassuring click. When you first use it, it takes a little while to work out how it all fits together but it soon becomes clear. There's no mistaking what the two controls do: one is the on/off switch, the other winds the cable. There's nothing else to worry about. It's the same with the different accessories, like the brush for wooden floors and the attachments for furniture and getting into corners: they clip neatly on to the handle.
The handle left us somewhat surprised, actually, as it weighs 1.5 kg on its own. If you add the main unit, the total weight climbs to 7 kg, which makes it much more tricky to handle than upright vacuum cleaners.
Other than that, there's an indicator of how full the bin is (though at 2 litres, it doesn't hold much), along with another for washing the HEPA 13 filter.
SuctionFive seconds from beginning to end to suck up two litres of dry rice: the RO8049 is a fast worker!
| Surface | Score |
| Lino | ![]() |
| Floorboards | ![]() |
| Carpet tile | ![]() |
| Deep-pile carpet | ![]() |
It won't be the quickest at getting the job done either, because even if you go over the same ground the same number of times, it only covers around 27 cm of carpet at once. That means it will take more work than some others to cover the same area.
However, you'll see later on that it's only this fast if you regularly maintain it and keep the filter clean; otherwise, the performance worsens.
NoiseWe measured noise levels of 70 dB from a distance of one metre, so calling it 'quiet' seems a little bit of an exaggeration to us. That said, it's still an excellent result for a bagless vacuum cleaner.

Other hoovers definitely make more noise, with the Dyson reaching 80 dB, but the quietest hoovers with bags are closer to 60 dB. The noise levels are the same no matter how full the bin is.
Energy ConsumptionSo the big question is: have Rowenta's engineers delivered their promised threat, and made you use 2100 W as soon as you turn your new vacuum cleaner on? No, but they came close: we found consumption peaked at 1860 W, which is a huge amount of energy however you look at it.
Emptying and CleaningThings really didn't go well here. The cone-shaped filter really couldn't handle cocoa powder, and the way you get it out doesn't help matters. Opening the bin causes a small amount of air to rush in, causing some of what's caught in the pleats of the filter to fall out.

Cleaning the filter wasn't much fun either. We got it back looking new again, but it took a lot of work. The smell of the cocoa powder took a lot time to disappear. The most annoying thing is that the suction power falls if you don't do this regularly. Because it starts so high to begin with, you probably won't notice at first, but as time goes by, the filter gradually gets more and more clogged up. We found this happened more quickly here than it did on some competing models, with Dyson not affected by the problem at all.
- Weight of filter before the cocoa test: 917 g
- Weight of filter after: 927 g
So 10 g are stuck in the filter somewhere rather than on the other side in the bin.
The RO8049 also has an automatic filter cleaning mode, which you can sometimes hear working. We weren't at all convinced that it did anything to help matters.
Durability![]() |
![]() |
Unlike Dyson, Rowenta wouldn't let us test the durability of its hoovers by dropping them downstairs. The fact that they wouldn't take part means they score zero for that particular factor, which brings the overall score down.
We did just about everything else though, twisting the tube, yanking on the cable, pulling it this way and that and even standing on the hoover. The RO8049 did perfectly in all of these tests, and is certainly strong enough to withstand the wear and tear of everyday use.
It doesn't get too hot either. If something gets stuck, the motor reduces power rather than going at it and overheating, which is excellent.
Pluses
-
Great airflow: 2 litres in 5 seconds
-
Attractive finish
-
Easy to use
-
Brush for wooden floors
Minuses
-
Uses a lot of electricity
-
Heavy to handle
-
Less effective on carpet
-
Filter is hard to clean, and the automatic programme doesn't work very well
-
Not very quiet: 70 dB
The RO8049 is powerful and seems strong enough, but it uses a lot of energy and is a lot more noisy than Rowenta claims. Above all, though, we really didn't like the filter.

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
Show all specifications
Hide specifications




