Philips 240BW
| Caractéristiques | |||
| Screen size | 24 inches | ||
| Panel type | TN | ||
| Resolution | 1920 x 1200 pixels | ||
| Response time | 5 ms | ||
| Inputs (HDMI / DVI / VGA / Component) | 0 / 1 / 1 / 0 | ||
Show all specifications
|
|||
| Other details | Pied ajustable en hauteur, pivot |
| Viewing angles (H/V) | 160° / 160° |
| 3D | no |
Hide specifications | |
Vincent Alzieu
Test date: January 24, 2008
Test date: January 24, 2008
This screen starts off on a good note : it’s vertically adjustable and it can be pivoted. Another good surprise is that it is a new clone of the excellent Iiyama B2403WS or at least the bezel is identical (except the integrated speakers which were abandoned). This is no big deal because they weren’t that great anyway. However, the big problem is that for an equivalent price to the Iiyama, the Philips doesn’t have an HDMI connection (it does have a DVI) and especially the panel now has a response time of 5 ms. The difference is noticeable and afterglow is definitely more pronounced.
The same as the B2403WS but slower
Otherwise, we find the welcome qualities of the B2403WS on this Philips:
- a very deep black at 0.23 cd/m² when white is at 200 cd/m²,
- good presettings with fine color fidelity and no particular dominance.
Nevertheless, we can’t really see why someone would opt for this screen instead of its more reactive and better equipped clones by Iiyama and Belinea.
Pluses
-
Nice colors
-
Vertically adjustable
-
Nice finishing touches
Minuses
-
5 ms panel which is less reactive than the Iiyama
-
No HDMI
-
No zero dead pixel warranty
-
TN panel means it turns black from below
Without any benefit to our budget, the 240BW is less reactive than the Iiyama as well as not having an HDMI. Philips does however maintain a competitive price contrary to other major brands. Dell, ViewSonic, and LG amongst other dont manage to do this at the moment.
Pick your rival…

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
More suggestions
Less suggestions
