Philips 227E3LH
| Caractéristiques | |||
| Screen size | 22 inches | ||
| Panel type | TN | ||
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 pixels | ||
| Response time | 2 ms | ||
| Inputs (HDMI / DVI / VGA / Component) | 1 / 1 / 1 / 0 | ||
Show all specifications
|
|||
| Other details | Speakers and headphone jack |
| Viewing angles (H/V) | 170 ° / 160 ° |
| 3D | no |
Hide specifications | |
Alexandre Botella
Translator: Sam McGeever
Test date: August 18, 2011
Translator: Sam McGeever
Test date: August 18, 2011
When Philips Is Actually TPV Technology

Philips' monitors might have the Dutch firm's name on them, but that's little more than a label. The entire monitor division was sold to the Chinese group TPV in 2008, which also owns AOC. The company is also set to take over production of Philips TVs for the European market in 2012. In reality, the consistent manufacturing problems are TPV's fault, but when we refer to Philips in the article, that's because we think the company should take note of the products it's giving its name to!
The 227E3LH is a 22'' Full HD monitor from Philips with a 2 ms response time. The manufacturer is clearly hoping that it will over gamers keen for both a stylish design and an impressive spec, which is ambitious stuff.
Standard design
The 227E3LH has a fairly standard design, and the only interesting features are the inputs and outputs, which include the usual trio of VGA, DVI and HDMI for video, as well as a pair of speakers and a headphone jack at the bottom. You can tilt the display back a few degrees, but that's about it.
The combination of a HDMI input and an audio output mean you can in theory use it as an extra television, connected to your tuner or IP TV box, or alongside a DVD player or games console.
Reverse ghosting
Whenever Philips bills one of its monitors as having a 2 ms response time, reverse ghosting inevitably crops up, and this monitor is no exception. We suggest you deactivate the 'Smart Response' feature to get around the problem, but that means you fall back to a classic 5 ms TN-based display.
This problem is so widespread that we've come to expect it on every Philips monitor we test. Every time we spot it on one of the company's supposedly 2 ms monitors, we raise the issue with them, but in over three years, nothing has changed. In the absence of any action, we're hoping that one day we'll fall on the exception that proves the rule which might well save Philips' otherwise excellent reputation. Here's hoping, anyway ...
| Responsiveness | ||
![]() |
||
|
Light Background |
Dark Background |
Average |
This graph shows the ghosting time, measured in ms, that the monitor takes to entirely remove the previous frame. The shorter the time, the more fluid moving images will appear
There weren't any problems with input lag, which is well below the threshold of human perception and so won't have any kind of impact on multiplayer gaming.
Colours: compulsory calibration
Given the disastrous responsiveness, Philips was going to have to pray for accurate colour reproduction in order to save the day, but with the default settings at least, the results are far from impressive. With a deltaE score of 6.0, colours aren't accurate enough, and the gamma curve is much too high.
deltaE before calibration
We tried—and failed—several times to tweak the settings before admitting that the only way to get accurate colours on the Philips 227E3LH is via a calibration profile.
The contrast doesn't help much either as this monitor barely manages an average contrast ratio of just over 700:1, well short of the average found on other monitors and another nail in the 227E3LH's coffin. In this case, it's doubly disappointing as this one thing that Philips usually gets right. This time around, though, it's what finally condemns it to a score of just two stars.
Share your comments in the forum :
Philips 227E3LH
Pluses
-
Design
Minuses
-
Below average contrast
-
Colour reproduction isn't accurate
-
Reverse ghosting
With reverse ghosting, problems with colour reproduction and a very basic range of options, the Philips 227E3LH monitor can't really expect to be on anybody's wish list any time soon.

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
More suggestions
Less suggestions 
