Face-Off: Pick the Products You Want to Compare

LG Flatron IPS237L Asus PA246Q
Photo
LG Flatron IPS237L
Overview - Full review
Asus PA246Q
Overview - Full review
Price
Gaming: Best Result
LG Flatron IPS237L
Asus PA246Q
Score
3/5
5/5
User Score
5/5 (1)
3/5 (5)
Subscores
  • Design and Build3/5
  • Colours and Contrast3/5
  • Responsiveness3/5
  • Design and Build5/5
  • Colours and Contrast4/5
  • Responsiveness4/5
Specifications
Specifications
Screen size23 inches
Panel typeIPS
Resolution1920 x 1080 pixels
Response time5 ms
Inputs (HDMI / DVI / VGA / Component)2 / 0 / 1 / 0
Other detailsHeadphones
Viewing angles (H/V)170 ° / 170 °
3Dno
Specifications
Screen size24 inches
Panel typeIPS
Resolution1920 x 1200 pixels
Response time6 ms
Inputs (HDMI / DVI / VGA / Component)1 / 1 / 1 / 0
Other detailsDisplay Port input, two-port USB hub, card reader
Viewing angles (H/V)178 ° / 178 °
3Dno
Conclusion
On paper, the LG Flatron IPS237L looks to be full of good ideas, but this monitor proved rather less convincing in practice. That said, it would still be suitable for non-gamers or anyone who's not bothered about 100% accurate colours. Plus, screen viewing angles are nice and wide, and MHL support is a rare feature in the current monitor market ... if that's something you'll find use for.
Despite a rather disappointing contrast ratio (which is a common problem for IPS displays), the Asus PA246Q is an excellent monitor. It combines a great design, accurate colour reproduction, wide viewing angles and a fast enough display for gaming. Better still, it sells at a very accessible price for a monitor aimed at professional users.
Pros

+

IPS screen, wide viewing angles

+

Slim bezel (approximately 1 cm)

+

HDMI entry with MHL support (for connection to a compatible smartphone)

+

Wide viewing angles

+

Colours calibrated at the factory

+

1920 x 1200 pixel resolution

+

Great finish

+

Design: stand, connectivity, accessories

Cons

-

Below average contrast (760:1)

-

Reverse ghosting is visible with out-of-the-box settings

-

Response times could be better

-

Energy consumption

-

Below average contrast ratio