MSI Wind U100
| Caractéristiques | |||
| CPU | Intel Atom 1.6 GHz | ||
| Graphics chipset | Intel 945GSE | ||
| RAM | 1 GB | ||
| Screen | 10 inches 1024 x 600 pixels | ||
| Hard drive | 80 GB | ||
Show all specifications
|
|||
| Optical drive | No |
| Dimensions | 60 x 180 x 31.5 mm |
| Weight | 1.2 kg |
Hide specifications | |
Florent Alzieu
Test date: November 4, 2008
Test date: November 4, 2008
Screen

Size & Viewing Angles
MSI has chosen a 10'' matte screen for the Wind U100. As is the case with nearly all laptops, this is powered by a TN panel which gives very poor viewing angles from above and below but performs a little better when you tilt the computer from side to side.
Backlighting
We noticed a problem with uneven backlighting, with the top and bottom of the screen brighter than the center. It's not a huge problem, but it is difficult to ignore.
Colors
We recommend calibrating the screen to get better results: while the default colors are by and large passable, skin tones in particular look a little blue using the default settings.
MSI has chosen a 10'' matte screen for the Wind U100. As is the case with nearly all laptops, this is powered by a TN panel which gives very poor viewing angles from above and below but performs a little better when you tilt the computer from side to side.
Backlighting
We noticed a problem with uneven backlighting, with the top and bottom of the screen brighter than the center. It's not a huge problem, but it is difficult to ignore.
Colors
We recommend calibrating the screen to get better results: while the default colors are by and large passable, skin tones in particular look a little blue using the default settings.
The Medion Mini Akoya E1210, which we tested last month, is widely regarded as a clone of this netbook, the MSI Wind U100.
Both products offer a 10'' screen in the same case, but, on closer inspection, we discovered some minor differences that separate the two netbooks.
Handling & Connectivity
![]() |
| Typical webcam shot |
Right down to the level of the keyboard, everything seems to be the same, including the Ctrl and Fn in the wrong place, exchanging places at the bottom left of the keyboard.
It's the same with the touchpad, which once again feels far too small for the size of the computer.
There are some differences though: some keys are slightly larger on this netbook, including chunkier arrows and an evening out of the letters at the right-hand side of the keyboard which aren't as squashed as on Medion's version.
The webcam produces much more natural colors, but the internal microphone is disappointing: there's a lot of very obvious feedback and random glitches and breaks in the sound quality make VOIP conversations difficult even with a good connection.
In terms of connectivity, the only main difference separating Medion's netbook from its model is the inclusion of a Bluetooth module on this netbook.
Elsewhere, all of the ports are exactly the same: 3 USB, an Ethernet port, a VGA output, a memory card reader and pair of mini-jacks for headphones and a microphone.
You'll probably find yourself using these jacks too, as the speakers are as ropey as the microphone, giving a very weak sound that comes nowhere near the crisp, powerful results of either members of the Asus EeePC series we've tested, the 901 or the 1000H.
![]() |
![]() |
| USB port and memory card reader |
Touchpad |
![]() |
![]() |
| Webcam |
Mini Jack, VGA |
Processor Power
Indeed, this slow boot time would put the U100 at the bottom of the table when it comes to speed, but fortunately, a solid performance from its hard drive improves matters.
According to the HdTach benchmark, the U100 reached speeds approaching those of Asus 1000H, performing particularly well at reading files to copy to an external hard drive.
The U100's Atom processor from Intel gives it enough power to read the majority of video files and launch applications quickly.
It's fine for classic netbook applications (surfing the web, VoIP or word processing for instance), but more demanding tasks like encoding audio and video or complicated design work takes two to three times longer than it does on a 'normal' laptop.
Battery Life & Portability
The most disappointing thing about this laptop is definitely its battery life.When we tried our standard test of looping a video file with the headphones plugged in and the screen brightness set to 100 cd/m², it only lasted 1 hour 42 minutes.
That's a long way behind Asus' series of EeePCs which regularly get close to 5 hours.
The fact that you can improve performance by upgrading to a more powerful 4900 mAh battery in place of the standard 2200 mAh option is less reassuring when you discover it costs 100 euros (125 USD / 80 GBP).
At 365 g, its charger is a little lighter than that of Medion's version, but still a lot heavier than the 200 g power block that ships with Hercules' eCAFE, for instance.
While you might think that the weight of the charger isn't very relevant, you'll almost certainly need to carry it round with you given the poor battery life and you'll soon begin to curse the extra weight.
Pluses
-
Big screen
-
Fast
-
Larger keyboard is more ergonomic
-
Plenty of storage: either 80 GB or 160 GB
Minuses
-
Very poor battery life
-
Feedback on webcam microphone
-
Small touchpad
-
Fn and Ctrl keys swapped on keyboard
It's impossible to deny the similarity of Medion's Mini Akoya E1210 to this model, but there a few differences nonetheless. Whatever you think of these near-clones, they still don't present a very serious threat to Asus' EeePC series.

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
More suggestions
Less suggestions 




