Home > News
iPhone 3G S: encrypted but not secure
Franck Mée
July 27, 2009 2:11 PM
July 27, 2009 2:11 PM
The iPhone 3G S ecryption system was supposed to reassure users, in particular business users. The problem is that apparently only a couple of minutes are needed to break it and three quarters of an hour to copy an entire raw disk image.Apple says on its iPhone 3GS presentation page that it offers a highly secure encryption that allows you to remote wipe, giving this as a choice sales argument for users whose phones may contain confidential information that shouldn't be allowed free circuation in the case of theft of a device.
This is a problem according to Jonathan Zdziarski, iPhone specialist, as the encryption is not secure. He says: "Apple may be technically correct that [the iPhone 3GS] has an encryption piece in it, but it's entirely useless toward security."
In a demo video that he has published, an iPhone 3GS is shown starting in restore mode and executing a modified kernel to recover an entire raw disk image and store it on a computer. You don’t even need to enter the PIN! An entire raw disk image can be obtained in 45 minutes.
The problem is that the image in question is not encrypted: the iPhone decrypts the data before sending it to the computer. This means all the phone's data is recovered as it stands – images, documents and even logs containing key entries…
As for the remote wipe function promoted by Apple, it is also limited: when the device is stolen it receives the wipe command remotely. In other words all a thief has to do is remove the SIM card to deactivate this function and take their time to retrieve any data.
The code PIN itself can be dealt with in less than ten minutes anyway, via readily available tools such as Jailbreak – once again Zdziarski has published a demo video to show how this is done.
According to Zdziarski, then, the iPhone shouldn’t be used in any context where data security is important. All the same, these problems only become so when your iPhone is actually stolen: you can’t gain access to data at a distance and control the device remotely. Your average user doesn’t in any case generally store any very valuable data in their phone: the problem is really only for business users.
The choice has to be made between what is an eminently useful device and data security: all companies that handle sensitive data know that no perfectly secure system exists and that it is prudent to have a system in place to deal with the theft of data.
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
Source:
Wired
Previous story / Next story
-
31/07Phone test: the Toshiba TG01 (good intentions
-
28/07Burning a plasma for 1H: results and comments hot out the lab
-
27/07TV Test Round Up: Sony, Sharp and LG
-
Current story -iPhone 3G S: encrypted but not secure
-
27/07Google on Google bombing
-
27/07Online advertising: slowdown in growth
-
24/07New Product Survey: USB Keys
-
5/22/12Samsung Vs Apple: End In Sight?
-
5/14/12Loewe Denies Rumours Of An Apple Takeover Bid. And yet...
-
4/23/12iPhone 5 Release Postponed?
-
4/17/12Foxconn: Working Conditions Tough, But It's No Labour Camp
-
4/11/12New iPad Wi-Fi Issues: Apple Investigates and Exchanges
-
3/26/12RIM Knocked Off Its Perch In Canada
-
3/21/12Tablet Review: Apple's New iPad (They Should Have Called It iCandy)
-
3/19/12The New iPad Soars, Bringing Apple Shares With It
-
3/19/12New iPad Camera Test: View and Compare Sample Shots
-
3/16/12Test: New iPad Beats Asus Transformer Prime on Graphics Processing

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
