Size, noise and heat generation
Slightly smaller than the GTX 465, the GeForce GTX 460 only measures 21 cm in length. This gives it a great advantage: you can install it in any casing. Some manufacturers are offering even smaller versions.
First surprise, the stock cooler is discreet, very discreet (40.5 dB(A)). At idle, you can hardly hear it. This puts it in the same category as the quietest cards out there, such as the Radeon HD 5850. And what about 3D? Well, it's the same! Although the fan can be clearly heard (45.8 dB(A)), we're still light years away from the turbine effect of models such as the 465 or 480.
To make things even better, these low noise levels are accompanied by low heat levels. At 31°C at idle and 72°C in 3D load, the GeForce GTX 460 even does better than the Radeon HD 5850, already an exemplary model.
The new revision of the NVIDIA (GF104) chip also does wonders when it comes to energy consumption. Veritable achilles heel on the GTX 465, GTX 470 and GTX 480, this has now been corrected. At 89 W in idle and 289 W in 3D activity (values for the whole configuration), we're very close to the excellent Radeon HD 5850 (84 W and 266 W). Good work!
As you've no doubt realised, the GeForce GTX 460 competes directly with the Radeon HD 5850. Generally speaking, the cards are on an equal footing when it comes to video gaming, though the ATI model does outdo the NVIDIA card by a short head. Both cards allow you to run the most demanding games in very good conditions and are of course compatible with DirectX 11 games and effects.
In Crysis Warhead, at 1920 x 1200 pixels and with texture filters activated, the GTX 460 scores an average of 22 fps. The Radeon HD 5850 gives an average of 24 fps. The trend is the same with ArmA 2 where, in the same conditions, the cards give an average of 28 fps and 35 fps respectively.
Click on the image to see all our readings
and compare this model with other cards
On some games however things are the other way round. In Far Cry 2 for example, the GeForce gives an average of 58 fps and the Radeon just 45 fps. Another example: World in Conflict: Soviet Assault. The NVIDIA card is at 45 fps while the ATI is at 42 fps.
In conclusion, we can only salute the performance levels achieved here by NVIDIA. The improvements made to the graphics chip are clearly bearing their fruits and wipe out the downsides of the other models: energy consumption, noise, and heat are now contained.
Note however that the name of the card is misleading. Another GeForce GTX 460 also exists, with just 768 MB of memory. This model gives much lower performance in games. Note also that the GeForce GTX 465 is less rapid than this 460, consumes more energy, heats up more and is noisier. Avoid it and go for this GTX 460.
- Good 3D performance overall
- Very good energy consumption levels
- Silent in 2D load
- DirectX 11 compatibility
- CUDA, PhysX, 3D Vision compatible
- 3D gaming performance limited
No doubt about it, this is an excellent DirectX 11, mid-range graphics card. Assuredly a very good buy for those who want to do their gaming without overspending. What's more, the various NVIDIA technologies make it an interesting technical proposition.