Nvidia GeForce GT 220 512 MB
| Caractéristiques | |||
| Chip | GT216 | ||
| GPU frequency | 625 MHz | ||
| Memory quantity | 512 MB | ||
| Memory type | GDDR2 | ||
| Memory frequency | 405 MHz | ||
Show all specifications
|
|||
| Cooler | Single level |
| Connectors | 1x DVI + 1x HDMI + 1x VGA |
| Driver tested | ForceWare 196.21 |
Hide specifications | |
Régis Jehl
Test date: March 17, 2010
Test date: March 17, 2010
The card at a glance

For our tests, MSI supplied us with the N220GT MD512. We were very disappointed with the fan. It can't be set and runs at maximum speed all the time. And it's very loud: we read it at 45.6 dB(A). Terrible!
There are 3 video outs, the DVI, HDMI and and VGA. In contrast to the Radeon HD 5450 however, you can't channel HD (DTS HD MA, DD True HD) in bitstream via the HDMI out. The PCM 7.1 signal isnt' supported either. This makes the HDMI out relatively poor in terms of audio signals.
The card comes with a CD of drivers and a rapid installation guide. There aren't any games or apps designed to play different media.
On the market since October 2009, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 512 MB is an entry level model with no great pretension. The card sits opposite the ATI Radeon HD 5450 in terms of pricing.
Not for gamers!Like the competitor from ATI, you shouldn't expect to do much gaming with the GT220. Throughput in recent games is so weak that you have to lower all graphics settings to a minimum to hope to have a fluid display. In spite of everything however it does give slightly better performance than the HD 5450 at 1280 x 1024 pixels.
You can find all our readings in the graphics card face-off. And while there's not much point bothering with recent games, the card will handle titles such as Counter Strike Source or Team Fortress 2 - you do still need to lower your graphics settings. Note that the card is not DirectX 11 compatible, just DirectX 10.1.
Energy consumption: not as impressive as the competitionThe GT 220 isn't without interest. In particular it'll take the load off a lower end processor or one that you're asking too much of during playback of HD films. It isn't however perfect for your home cinema PC. We were disappointed with its power consumption that is higher than for the Radeon HD 5450. In standby, the GeForce is at 113W as against 72W on the competition.
This graphics processor can be found in various makes of card, some of which are at full height, while others, much more expensive, are in "low profile" format. If you're looking to put it in a home cinema PC, you'll probably want to go for a large casing, which isn't necessarily compatible with such usage.
Pluses
-
HDMI out
Minuses
-
Fan cooling
-
No HD bitstream from HDMI out
-
Energy consumption at rest is higher than on the competition
-
Not for gamers
This card is well adapted neither for gaming nor home cinema. Performance levels and features are better on competitor cards.
Pick your rival…

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
More suggestions
Less suggestions
