Face-Off: Pick the Products You Want to Compare
| Nvidia GeForce GTX 275 896 MB | AMD Radeon HD 7990 | Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 2GB | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Photo
|
 Overview - Full review |
 Overview - Full review |
 Overview - Full review |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Price
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1680 x 1050 = LCD 20 / 22 inch 1/2
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 275 896 MB  |
AMD Radeon HD 7990  |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 2GB  |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Score
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User Score
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Specifications
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conclusion
|
This is the minimum card if you want to use 3D Vision. Its performance makes it suitable for mid-resolution displays, but there are now midrange models with significantly better performance available. |
Before releasing its new-gen graphics cards, AMD seemed intent on claiming the title of fastest model on the market. That has definitely been achieved with the Radeon HD 7990. This twin-GPU graphics card beats its competitors on performance, but it's not without its own limitations. |
As was to be expected, with the GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost, Nvidia has outed a well-rounded video card with performance that matches the competition. But be warned, for your ears' sake we suggest opting for a model with an alternative cooling system. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Pros
|
+ Good performance on mid-definition displays + Runs significantly less hot + Reduced noise in 3D + 3D Vision compatibility |
+ Performances + Low noise levels when idle + ZeroCore Power function |
+ Competitive performance + Low power consumption + Added features: frames-per-second limiting, advanced vertical synchronisation, etc. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Cons
|
- Power consumption in 3D - Could be quieter in 2D |
- Power module makes quite a piercing noise |
- Annoying fan noise - GPU Boost: different cards will vary slightly in performance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||