Subscores
The Radeon HD 5870 was the first DirectX 11 graphics card on the market. It claims very high-level 3D performance, better control over power consumption and lower temperatures. Does it deliver?
Size, Noise and Heat
The Radeon HD 5870 is a large card. It measures no less than 28 cm, so you'll have to make sure your computer casing is big enough to house it. Its double-decker cooler is also fairly heavy, bringing the weight up to 960 g, that's 200 g heavier than the previous generation of cards.
Noise levels have improved, though you couldn't exactly call the cooler quiet. At 39.7 dB(A) in 2D, it's audible, though fairly muffled and not too annoying. In 3D, however, the fan ramps up and levels reach a high 56.7 dB(A). Forewarned is forearmed: it may be a nuisance for the people around you.
The overheating problem has been greatly improved since the 4000 series. The chip remains lukewarm at idle (35°C) and heats up to 88°C under full load.
Power Consumption
This model has really done wonders in this department. With an 93-watt power draw at idle, it's 50 watts more efficient than the previous generation and 10 watts more efficient than the GeForce GTX 285, which is already a very economical card. And the performance holds up, with only a 327-watt draw during 3D activity. That's quite an accomplishment considering the card's high framerates during gameplay. Note that this graphics card uses two 6-pin PCI-E connectors.
Gaming Performance
Although it's getting quite old now, the Radeon HD 5870 can still hold its own compared with new generations of graphics card. In terms of performance, it's comparable to the NVIDIA GTX 560 Ti or the Radeon HD 6950.

Performance average.
Click on the image to see all our readings
and compare this model with other graphics cards.
This card's performance levels are good enough for breezing through 2011 games without too much trouble, even on a high-definition monitor.
Size, Noise and HeatThe Radeon HD 5870 is a large card. It measures no less than 28 cm, so you'll have to make sure your computer casing is big enough to house it. Its double-decker cooler is also fairly heavy, bringing the weight up to 960 g, that's 200 g heavier than the previous generation of cards.
Noise levels have improved, though you couldn't exactly call the cooler quiet. At 39.7 dB(A) in 2D, it's audible, though fairly muffled and not too annoying. In 3D, however, the fan ramps up and levels reach a high 56.7 dB(A). Forewarned is forearmed: it may be a nuisance for the people around you.
The overheating problem has been greatly improved since the 4000 series. The chip remains lukewarm at idle (35°C) and heats up to 88°C under full load.
Power ConsumptionThis model has really done wonders in this department. With an 93-watt power draw at idle, it's 50 watts more efficient than the previous generation and 10 watts more efficient than the GeForce GTX 285, which is already a very economical card. And the performance holds up, with only a 327-watt draw during 3D activity. That's quite an accomplishment considering the card's high framerates during gameplay. Note that this graphics card uses two 6-pin PCI-E connectors.
Gaming PerformanceAlthough it's getting quite old now, the Radeon HD 5870 can still hold its own compared with new generations of graphics card. In terms of performance, it's comparable to the NVIDIA GTX 560 Ti or the Radeon HD 6950.

Performance average.
Click on the image to see all our readings
and compare this model with other graphics cards.
This card's performance levels are good enough for breezing through 2011 games without too much trouble, even on a high-definition monitor.
| Graphics Cards: Performance Index Tables |
Pros
- Good 3D gaming performance, even at high resolution
- Low power consumption
- Low noise and heat at idle
- DirectX 11 compatibility
Cons
- Bulky
Conclusion
This is a graphics card with top-flight performance. We especially like its low power consumption at idle. This card will please hardcore gamers who are also looking for an energy-efficient option.
OUR SCORE




DigitalVersus on...