logo_print logo_print_pub
Duels: Battle of the Five Star Products >

Panasonic PT-AX200E vs Samsung SP-A600B

Florent Alzieu
Updated: April 16, 2010

On the left, we've got the Panasonic PT-AX200E high-end, 720p, HD Ready tri-LCD projector. This excellent projector scored five stars in our test, and although it's been around for a few years now, it's still selling well. Its age, however, does mean it faces tough competition from a new generation of entry-level, Full HD DLP projectors. |
|
|
|
|
|
On the right, the Samsung SP-A600B is a 1080p, Full HD DLP projector. This product is fairly representative of most entry-level projectors equipped with Texas Instruments chips. For example, it's pretty much interchangeable with the Optoma HD20 or the Mitsubishi HC3200.


|
|
|
|
|
|

MARCHANDS
 
 
Amazon.co.uk  659.00 
Compare prices
Tri-LCD | DLP
1208 x 720 dots | 1920 x 1080 dots
2 x HDMI - 1 x Component
| 2 x HDMI - 1 x Component
Lens shift: Yes
| Lens shift: No
Max. diagonal picture size and min. projection area from a distance of 3 metres: 2.49m - 1.25 m
| Max. diagonal picture size and min. projection area from a distance of 3 metres: 2.27m - 1.73 m


BACKGROUND

When released in 2007, the PT-AX200E was a top-of-the-range projector, but for the last two years it's been facing increasingly tough competition from Full HD models. Although much more expensive it first arrived on the market, Full HD technology is now increasingly affordable. DLP projectors have shown the biggest price drop of all, and although inferior in terms of handling and design, they do offer improved picture quality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
Texas Instruments' DLP technology is now used in projectors from manufacturers such as Samsung and Optoma (which was the first, in fact). This has seriously brought down the price of Full HD projectors, even if the hardware and design are somewhat basic. And although they're far from perfect, DLP projectors are serious competition for older, high-end, 720p projectors like the Panasonic in this duel.

LCD or DLP? Both types of technology have their advantages and drawbacks. The introduction to our Full-HD video projectors survey will give you a basic idea of how LCD and DLP technology differ. You can then use this duel to compare and contrast the actual advantages and disadvantages of each type of technology in practice. Then it's over to you to take your pick!

 

DESIGN, HANDLING, HARDWARE: PANASONIC WINS


DLP projectors often lag behind LCD models when it comes to design, handling and hardware. The duel between these two products will highlight the advantages and drawbacks of each type of technology.

Zoom: in general, LCD projectors have more powerful zooms than their DLP counterparts, and the Panasonic is no exception, winning the zoom duel hands down. Projecting a large picture from a short distance has obvious advantages, but projecting a smaller image can also be useful, as it allows you to place the projector at the back of a room while still maintaining a decent-sized projection.

Lens shift: almost no DLP projectors have this function. The PT-AX200E lens shift takes the form of a joystick on the front panel that you can move around a circular axis to reposition the projected image on the screen or wall. This function allows you greater freedom in where you place the projector as you won't have to place it directly in front of the screen at exactly the right height.

Power consumption: 0 watts for the Panasonic and 0.6 watts for the Samsung. Both excellent scores.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
Rainbow effect: this is caused by the mono-chip DLP projection system. The rainbow effect is visible and unavoidable in black and white pictures, but it's less apparent in bright or colour pictures. Just how noticeable and how annoying the effect appears will vary from user to user. This is the major drawback of DLP technology.

Noise levels in operation: we recorded 25.5 dB for the Samsung and 27.5 dB for the Panasonic. Samsung wins but both are good scores.

Connections: apart from a few minor differences, both projectors have pretty much the same connections.

Design: although the quality of the picture projected is way more important than the projector's design, it's still worth mentioning that Samsung's projector breaks the mould with an original appearance that won't look out of place in a stylish living room.

PICTURE QUALITY: VICTORY FOR SAMSUNG

Dynamic iris: to improve the depth of black, the Panasonic PT-AX200E can partially mask the light source using an integrated iris system. The animation in the insert section of the product test shows how it works. This is practical for scenes that are dark overall, but it doesn't give enough depth to dark areas surrounded by lighter colours.

Smooth Screen: to reduce visibility of the matrix, the PT-AX200E uses a crystal to multiply the surface area of the pixels by 1.5, thus masking the black lines of the grid. This does, however, slightly reduce the sharpness of the picture, making it less suitable for office use (e.g. displaying Excel tables).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resolution: 1080 or 720 lines? It looks like a foregone conclusion, and it's tempting to go straight for the 1080-line resolution. It's not quite so simple though, as we'll see in the DVD and Blu-Ray section below. However, generally speaking, we'd recommend the higher resolution in most cases.

Depth of black: as yet, DLP projectors are still way ahead on this one. At an equivalent brightness setting, a DLP projector will produce a deeper black than an LCD model, and the SP-A600B merely serves to confirm this.

 DVD, BLU-RAY & TV: SAMSUNG WINS

TV: it all depends on the source. TV channels are currently broadcast in SD, but the arrival of HD channels is just around the corner. The quality of the broadcasts is, however, variable. This makes a good internal upscaling function essential, unless you can count on an upscaling function in your external amplifier or media centre to do the job instead.

We'd be tempted to advise you to use a 720p projector for lower-quality broadcasts and 1080p for HD channels, if and when you have access to them. The only thing is, a projector is an investment that you're likely to keep for several years. So hopefully, if HD channels really take off, you'll be able to watch more and more programmes in HD. With this in mind, you might be better off picking a Full HD model, as it'll be more useful in the future, even if you'll have to put up with poor-quality SD broadcasting for the time being.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
DVD: given that DVD discs are encoded with 480 or 576 lines, we often hear people say that projectors displaying fewer lines—i.e. HD Ready models with 720 lines—will be better for DVD playback than a Full HD model. This is a bit of a hasty conclusion though, as it actually all depends on the quality of the upscaling. Unfortunately, projectors simply can't compete with the upscaling quality of latest generation DVD/Blu-ray players or HD consoles. In conclusion, we'd recommend a 1080p projector for playing DVDs but with a DVD player offering good-quality upscaling.

Blu-ray: it would be a shame to watch a Blu-ray in anything other than 1080p resolution. Otherwise, you won't get the best out of all the detail encoded in the disc, as the projector will simply downscale the definition to a lower resolution.

 

LAMP LIFESPAN, PRICE & BRIGHTNESS: NO WINNER

2,000 lumens must be better than 1,000 lumens? This is simply not true, as 1,000 lumens are largely sufficient for use in a pitch black room. If you can't get the room dark enough though, or if your projector is very, very far away from the screen, you might need a more powerful light source.

£304: that's the cost of a replacement lamp for the PT-AX200E. That's also about a third of the price of a new projector with the lamp included. The Samsung's replacement is slightly cheaper at around £250. Bring on the arrival of LED projectors!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 hours vs 2,500 hours: bulb lifespans are really quite hypothetical. As Panasonic quotes a higher figure, we'd naturally be tempted to give their model the slight advantage. Nevertheless, a long lifespan is also linked to good care and maintenance and use for occasional, long periods of time (2-3 hours), rather than short bursts (15 to 20 minutes here and there). So, as we're not able to check these figures, you'll just have to trust what the manufacturers say.

VERDICT: PANASONIC FOR HANDLING, SAMSUNG FOR PICTURE QUALITY

Hardware and handling are the main advantages the PT-AX200E has over the SP-A600B. If you need a powerful zoom and a lens shift function to position the projector more freely, then you should definitely pick the Panasonic. For picture quality and the depth of black, the DLP model does slightly better, even though more sensitive users could be bothered by the rainbow effect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The rainbow effect is the major downfall of all DLP projectors. Without this, we would definitely recommend the Samsung. The Panasonic offers excellent handling, but in the end, the most important factor (unless you've got a very complicated home layout) has got to be the picture quality. Go see how noticeable you find the rainbow effect by trying out the product in a shop. If it doesn't bother you then grab yourself a Samsung and don't look back.
A TV or a projector? First of all, remember that a projector is a device for occasional use, as the lamp's lifespan and price are both restrictive factors. You're not going to bother switching on your projector just to watch the evening news, and it's not advisable to use a projector instead of a TV for day-to-day viewing.
But let's get back to the question in hand. With 50-inch or larger LCD and plasma TVs now available for under £2,000 (sometimes even £1,000), it's definitely worth asking yourself whether it's worth getting a large-screen TV instead of a projector.

In my personal opinion, you're best option is a small TV for watching the news and suchlike, and a projector for watching films on the big screen. However, you have to remember that it's much simpler just to have a large-screen TV for watching everything rather than both a TV and a projector to set up as required. Having both means more cables, and unlike the TV, you'll need to use the projector in a pitch black room. So, for hassle-free viewing, I'd recommend a large-screen TV, but serious film fans will find it worth their while to invest in a projector too.

Our RSS News Feeds : 

Back to top