Face-Off: Pick the Products You Want to Compare

Sony Cyber-shot HX200V
Sony Cyber-shot HX200V
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Panasonic Lumix FZ200

Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
 
Sony Cyber-shot HX200V Canon PowerShot SX40 HS Panasonic Lumix FZ200 Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Photo
Sony Cyber-shot HX200V
Overview - Full review
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Overview - Full review
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Overview - Full review
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Overview - Full review
Price
Detail 1: 100% with zoom
Sony Cyber-shot HX200V
Canon PowerShot SX40 HS
Panasonic Lumix FZ200
Canon PowerShot SX50 HS
Score
5/5
4/5
5/5
4/5
User Score
4/5 (4)
4/5 (2)
5/5 (7)
5/5 (5)
Specifications
Specifications
SensorBSI CMOS 18 Mpx, 1/2.3", 63 Mpx/cm
Lens 30x 27 -810 mm f/2.8 -5.6
StabilisationOptical
ViewfinderElectronic
Screen7.5 mm, not TN, 921600 dots, 4:3,Not touch-sensitive
Sensitivity (ISO range)100 - 3200 ISO (ext. 12800 ISO)
Video mode1920 x 1080 pixels,50 fps, Stereo
Internal memory111MB
External memory
Connections
Power sourceN.A. N.A. / NP-FH50
Waterproofno, N.A.
Shock resistantno, N.A.
Dimensions/Weight87 x 122 x 99 mm / 580 g
Specifications
SensorBSI CMOS 12 Mpx, 1/2.3", 42 Mpx/cm
Lens 35x 24 -840 mm f/2.7 -5.8
StabilisationOptical
ViewfinderElectronic
Screen6.8 cm, not TN, 230000 dots, 4:3,Not touch-sensitive
Sensitivity (ISO range)100 - 3200 ISO
Video mode1920 x 1080 pixels,24 fps, Stereo
Internal memoryN.A.
External memory
Connections
Power sourceN.A. N.A. / NB-10L
Waterproofno, N.A.
Shock resistantno, N.A.
Dimensions/Weight92 x 123 x 108 mm / 590 g
Specifications
SensorCMOS 12 Mpx, 1/2.3", 42 Mpx/cm
Lens 24x 25 -600 mm f/2.8 -8
StabilisationOptical
ViewfinderElectronic
Screen7.6 cm, not TN, 460000 dots, 4:3,Not touch-sensitive
Sensitivity (ISO range)100 - 1600 ISO (ext. 6400 ISO)
Video mode1920 x 1080 pixels,50 fps, Stereo
Internal memory70MB
External memory
Connections
Power sourceN.A. N.A. / DMW-BLC12E (8.7Wh)
Waterproofno, N.A.
Shock resistantno, N.A.
Dimensions/Weight87 x 125 x 120 mm /
Specifications
SensorBSI CMOS 12 Mpx, 1/2.3", 42 Mpx/cm
Lens 50x 24 -1200 mm f/3.4 -6.5
StabilisationOptical
ViewfinderElectronic
Screen7.1 cm, not TN, 461000 dots, 4:3,Not touch-sensitive
Sensitivity (ISO range)80 - 6400 ISO
Video mode1920 x 1080 pixels,24 fps, Stereo
Internal memoryN.A.
External memory
Connections
Power sourceN.A. N.A. / NB-10L
Waterproofno, N.A.
Shock resistantno, N.A.
Dimensions/Weight91 x 123 x 114 mm / 587 g
Conclusion
The Cyber-shot HX200V brings a few nice updates (screen calibration, responsiveness) to an already excellent camera. For those of you who don't mind the effect of Sony's image processing in Jpeg shots, this is certainly THE bridge of the moment. However, for anyone looking to post-edit pictures, there's still no match for the Panasonic FZ150 and its RAW mode.
The Canon PowerShot SX40 HS is an excellent bridge, so long as you don't mind the smooth, shallow grip handle. In fact, it's probably the best compromise out there right now for pure picture quality (for Jpeg only, there's no RAW mode). However, the low-def screen and unimpressive responsiveness ultimately cost this bridge a fifth star.
Compared with its predecessors, the Panasonic Lumix FZ200 moves things up a gear thanks to its f/2.8 constant aperture lens. Image quality hasn't taken a huge leap forwards but it remains excellent. With top-notch quality in photo and video modes, and sheer originality, the FZ200 sets a new standard in today's bridge market.
The Canon PowerShot SX50 HS is an interesting and attractive bridge camera. Its 50x zoom sets it apart from competitors but image quality isn't on par with the Panasonic FZ200, for example, which makes do with a 24x zoom.
Pros

+

High-quality build, good design and handling

+

Sharp, comfortable-to-read vertical-tilt screen

+

Good general responsiveness

+

Advanced image processing and picture quality at long focal lengths

+

Full HD video at up to 50 fps with decent sound

+

Simple, clear interface

+

General picture quality (sharpness and sensitivity)

+

Full HD video with good-quality stereo sound

+

Good image quality up to 800 ISO

+

Lens with constant f/2.8 aperture

+

Full HD video at 50 fps with stereo sound

+

Good responsiveness

+

Good design and handling, easy to use, customisable features

+

RAW and Jpeg mode

+

RAW mode

+

Easy to use / Manual modes available

+

Good picture quality at wide-angle settings

+

Full HD video with good-quality stereo sound

+

Good grip

Cons

-

No Raw mode and Jpegs will still be too over-processed for some

-

Lens could be more consistent at wide-angle settings / Chromatic aberration visible at telephoto settings

-

Not enough customisable features (particularly the control ring)

-

Poor-quality electronic viewfinder

-

A higher resolution screen would be nice

-

Design and handling could be better (the grip handle in particular)

-

No RAW mode

-

Could be more responsive, a bit slow to start-up

-

Low-def, low-contrast viewfinder with sequential display

-

Plastic build, could be better quality

-

Strong chromatic aberration / Image lacks sharpness at telephoto

-

Autofocus isn't particularly reliable at telephoto settings

-

Poor-quality viewfinder

-

Video framerate just 24 fps