Home > News
Correction: Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels
Florent Alzieu
July 12, 2010 12:55 PM
July 12, 2010 12:55 PM
We've made a quick correction to the article on solar panels we published last Friday, with updated information on the different types of technology available.
Here's what the article now says:
You should look for a solar panel with a surface that's all the same colour. It depends. Monocrystalline panels are usually one single, solid colour, and offer the best output performances. However, they're also the most expensive type of solar panel. In descending order of both output and price, it goes monocrystalline, then polycrystalline and then amorphous, which is the kind of basic solar cell found in solar-powered calculators, for example. Polycrystalline panels therefore make a good compromise. So how can you spot one? If you look closely at the surface of a polycrystalline solar panel you'll see different coloured patches, like in the picture below:
So basically, monocrystalline solar panels are better than polycrystalline solar panels for output. However, they are also more expensive to produce.
Sorry for the confusion, and many thanks to Paul for bringing our attention to the problem via e-mail.
> Reviews: Solar Devices
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
Here's what the article now says:
You should look for a solar panel with a surface that's all the same colour. It depends. Monocrystalline panels are usually one single, solid colour, and offer the best output performances. However, they're also the most expensive type of solar panel. In descending order of both output and price, it goes monocrystalline, then polycrystalline and then amorphous, which is the kind of basic solar cell found in solar-powered calculators, for example. Polycrystalline panels therefore make a good compromise. So how can you spot one? If you look closely at the surface of a polycrystalline solar panel you'll see different coloured patches, like in the picture below:

So basically, monocrystalline solar panels are better than polycrystalline solar panels for output. However, they are also more expensive to produce.
Sorry for the confusion, and many thanks to Paul for bringing our attention to the problem via e-mail.
> Reviews: Solar Devices
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
Previous story / Next story
-
13/07Camera Face-Off Reorganised
-
12/07TV Review: LG 42LE8900, top-of-the range 200 Hz with Full LED
-
12/07Step Into Our Brand New Sound Studio!
-
Current story -Correction: Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels
-
12/07Monitor Review: Alienware does 120 Hz 3D on its OptX AW2310
-
11/07Recap: Last Week's Tests and Articles
-
09/07Sony presents its digital compact autumn range
-
9/6/11IFA 2011: New Colours for the Logitech K750 Keyboard
-
1/15/11Logitech Wireless Solar Keyboard K750 Now On Sale
-
11/29/10Vivien Muller's 'Electree' Solar Bonsai Charging Station
-
11/3/10Exclusive Review: Logitech Wireless Solar Keyboard K750
-
8/23/10Solar powered toothbrush (no toothpaste!)
-
7/9/10Solar Charger Reviews: Monkeys, Gorillas and ... Kodak!
-
5/28/10Bring on The Powermonkey and Solargorilla!

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
