Home > News
Camera Face-Off Reorganised
Franck Mée
July 13, 2010 9:40 AM
July 13, 2010 9:40 AM
Attentive readers might have noticed that we reorganised our digital camera face-off a few days ago. This should help make the various test shots easier to decipher and easier to compare. It should also make the face-off easier to use, in spite of the large number of shots in our new test procedure.
The main thing we've changed is the order of the test shots in the drop-down list. All the different-sized versions of one same 'detail' (i.e. a given section of the test scene) are now grouped together, so you can easily move from the 4" x 6" frame to the 8" x 12" frame then the 100% frame. You can then compare the 100% wide-angle shot and the 100% zoom shot. All the pictures of 'detail 1' (the bottle of oil towards the middle of the scene) are therefore now all listed together at the top of the drop-down menu. Shots of 'detail 2' (the map on the right-hand edge of the scene) are all listed together at the bottom of the drop-down menu.
This makes it easier to compare the different enlargement sizes. For example, you'll be able to see that for a 4" x 6" print, a camera phone with accurate colours will take a picture comparable in quality to the same shot taken with a decent digital camera, but for a 8" x 12" print, you'll notice a real different in quality between the two.
You'll also notice that we've removed the 8" x 12" with zoom detail shots. These were originally included to help you judge the accuracy of the lens at a long focal length (approximately 200 mm max.) compared to in wide-angle mode. However, it's not necessary to use resized shots to compare these factors, as comparing the 100% wide-angle frame with the 100% frame with zoom serves exactly the same purpose.
A new frame we've included is a macro shot of a ruler. This shows you the size of the smallest object the camera can fit into a full-frame shot. If the last line visible on the ruler is 5 cm, then any object smaller than 5 cm will only ever take up part of the overall frame.
Note that the test procedure hasn't changed. We may have reorganised the various pictures and changed their order in the drop-down menu, but the pictures themselves haven't changed a bit. The 2010 test procedure is likely to be in place for a while yet. The only real change in sight is a slight modification to our timing method. It's also possible that we could decide to add new tests, and thus create new entries in the face-off. And with the new audio testing lab now complete, we might even add some audio tests to the face-off (shutter release, video recording quality).
> Digital Camera & Camera Phone Face-Offs
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
The main thing we've changed is the order of the test shots in the drop-down list. All the different-sized versions of one same 'detail' (i.e. a given section of the test scene) are now grouped together, so you can easily move from the 4" x 6" frame to the 8" x 12" frame then the 100% frame. You can then compare the 100% wide-angle shot and the 100% zoom shot. All the pictures of 'detail 1' (the bottle of oil towards the middle of the scene) are therefore now all listed together at the top of the drop-down menu. Shots of 'detail 2' (the map on the right-hand edge of the scene) are all listed together at the bottom of the drop-down menu.
This makes it easier to compare the different enlargement sizes. For example, you'll be able to see that for a 4" x 6" print, a camera phone with accurate colours will take a picture comparable in quality to the same shot taken with a decent digital camera, but for a 8" x 12" print, you'll notice a real different in quality between the two.
You'll also notice that we've removed the 8" x 12" with zoom detail shots. These were originally included to help you judge the accuracy of the lens at a long focal length (approximately 200 mm max.) compared to in wide-angle mode. However, it's not necessary to use resized shots to compare these factors, as comparing the 100% wide-angle frame with the 100% frame with zoom serves exactly the same purpose.
A new frame we've included is a macro shot of a ruler. This shows you the size of the smallest object the camera can fit into a full-frame shot. If the last line visible on the ruler is 5 cm, then any object smaller than 5 cm will only ever take up part of the overall frame.Note that the test procedure hasn't changed. We may have reorganised the various pictures and changed their order in the drop-down menu, but the pictures themselves haven't changed a bit. The 2010 test procedure is likely to be in place for a while yet. The only real change in sight is a slight modification to our timing method. It's also possible that we could decide to add new tests, and thus create new entries in the face-off. And with the new audio testing lab now complete, we might even add some audio tests to the face-off (shutter release, video recording quality).
> Digital Camera & Camera Phone Face-Offs
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
Previous story / Next story
-
13/07Something else! The Sony Alpha 850 (£2149), in the face-off
-
13/07Camera Review: Samsung EX1 Expert Compact
-
13/07Nvidia GeForce GTX 460 with GF104 Fermi GPU
-
Current story -Camera Face-Off Reorganised
-
12/07TV Review: LG 42LE8900, top-of-the range 200 Hz with Full LED
-
12/07Step Into Our Brand New Sound Studio!
-
12/07Correction: Monocrystalline and Polycrystalline Solar Panels
-
2/9/12Sat Nav Review: The Navigon 92 Premium Live Takes On TomTom
-
2/9/12Pentax WG2 Gets BSI CMOS But Still No Stabilisation
-
2/8/12Blu-ray Player Test Procedure Updated
-
2/8/12Olympus Unveils Retro OM-D E-M5 Mirrorless Camera
-
2/7/12New Nikon D800 and D800E SLRs Boast Monster Resolution
-
2/7/12Canon Ixus 240 and 510 HS Get Wi-Fi!
-
2/7/12Canon Presents Entry-Level Compacts
-
2/7/12Canon Presents PowerShot D20 Underwater Compact
-
2/7/12This Week's Reviews & Last Week's Top Fives: Canon G1 X On Top
-
2/7/12Canon Announces SX240 and SX260 Superzoom Compacts

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors

