Home > News
Calculating the cost per page for inkjet printers: the ISO standard
Vincent Alzieu
August 28, 2009 5:19 PM
August 28, 2009 5:19 PM
The majority of manufacturers have recently adopted a standard for measuring the lifespan of their printer cartridges: the ISO/IEC 24711 test. And it's very reliable.
In the past, manufacturers used lifespans calculated using the '5%' method, ostensibly based on the fact that printing the 'average' document involves covering 5% of the total surface of the page. There was no fair way of comparing tests from different manufacturers and the results were rarely trustworthy. Now though, they use a new standard with very precise parameters, and the specifications of different manufacturers can be compared.
How it works
What we're most impressed with is the diversity of the pages that are printed. They're a very good representation of what we print ourselves--and might even involve more colour than most average users produce; they really don't scrimp on ink. That means we could even say that the lifespan figures that this new standard test produces are lower than you might achieve in reality. Apart from one detail, that is.
One small problem
The problem? That the pages are printed continuously. Nobody ever prints 800 pages in a row. Instead, after producing half a dozen or so pages, we turn the printer off. Then, when it's switched on again, the printer often starts an internal cleaning cycle to make sure its nozzles are clean, which wastes some ink. It might not sound much, but our tests have shown that between 5% and 20% of ink is lost during these operations. The less you print, the more the printer is switched off and the more ink you waste.
In the past, one of the main advantages of printers with separate cartridges was that they wasted less ink than mono-block cartridges with built-in print heads. That's no longer the case, as all the manufactures now have print heads in the printer itself, separate from the cartridges. That makes the consumables cheaper to produce and easier to recycle.
At the end of the day, these factors might well cancel each other out. On the one hand, the ISO standard uses page that require more ink than normal, but the test procedure itself minimises the amount of ink wasted cleaning. The results are very useful figures that make an excellent base for comparing printers.
> Product Survey: Multifunction Printers
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
In the past, manufacturers used lifespans calculated using the '5%' method, ostensibly based on the fact that printing the 'average' document involves covering 5% of the total surface of the page. There was no fair way of comparing tests from different manufacturers and the results were rarely trustworthy. Now though, they use a new standard with very precise parameters, and the specifications of different manufacturers can be compared.

How it works
- The five pages above are printed again and again in standard mode without any settings that would prolong the life of the cartridge, until it runs out.
- This test is repeated at least three times for each type of cartridge to make it more accurate.
What we're most impressed with is the diversity of the pages that are printed. They're a very good representation of what we print ourselves--and might even involve more colour than most average users produce; they really don't scrimp on ink. That means we could even say that the lifespan figures that this new standard test produces are lower than you might achieve in reality. Apart from one detail, that is.
One small problem
The problem? That the pages are printed continuously. Nobody ever prints 800 pages in a row. Instead, after producing half a dozen or so pages, we turn the printer off. Then, when it's switched on again, the printer often starts an internal cleaning cycle to make sure its nozzles are clean, which wastes some ink. It might not sound much, but our tests have shown that between 5% and 20% of ink is lost during these operations. The less you print, the more the printer is switched off and the more ink you waste.
In the past, one of the main advantages of printers with separate cartridges was that they wasted less ink than mono-block cartridges with built-in print heads. That's no longer the case, as all the manufactures now have print heads in the printer itself, separate from the cartridges. That makes the consumables cheaper to produce and easier to recycle.
At the end of the day, these factors might well cancel each other out. On the one hand, the ISO standard uses page that require more ink than normal, but the test procedure itself minimises the amount of ink wasted cleaning. The results are very useful figures that make an excellent base for comparing printers.
> Product Survey: Multifunction Printers
> Buyer's Guides: Our Pick of The Best Products
Previous story / Next story
-
31/08Burning a plasma: two weeks later
-
28/08Test: Casio Exilim H10 Camera
-
28/08G11 Preview images: going, going gone!
-
Current story -Calculating the cost per page for inkjet printers: the ISO standard
-
28/08New Test: Logitech G500
-
27/08Interview: NVIDIA CUDA, what applications for the general public?
-
27/08Hands-on Preview: Canon G11
-
2/1/12Printer Duel: Canon Pixma MG8250 vs HP Photosmart 7510 e-A-I-O
-
1/25/12Printer Review: Lexmark Pro715, For Those Who Prefer Buttons
-
1/18/12Printer Review: Xerox Workcentre 6015 NI, Colour, Laser All-In-One
-
1/11/12Printer Review: Lexmark Pro 915, Touchscreen and Connected
-
1/10/12BlackBox For Printing Texts
-
1/4/12Printer Review: Epson Stylus Office BX635FWD For Small Businesses
-
12/28/11Printer Review: HP Photosmart 7510, Affordable High-End
-
12/14/11Printer Review: Canon i-SENSYS LBP7018C, Budget Colour Laser
-
12/7/11Printer Review: Canon PIXMA MG8250, High End Photo
-
11/30/11Printer Review: Samsung ML-1670, Entry-Level, Compact Laser

News
Buyer's Guide: The Best Monitors
