Sharp Aquos LC-32X20E

![]() | |||
| Screen size | 32 inches (81 cm) | ||
| Resolution | 1920 x 1080 points | ||
| HD compatibility (1080i/720p) | Oui et 1080p | ||
| HD Ready certification | Oui et HD Ready 1080p | ||
| Brightness | 450 cd/m² | ||
See all specifications | |||
| Contrast ratio | 2000:1 |
| Viewing angles (H+V) | 176° / 176° |
| Response time | 4 ms |
| Sound level | 2 x 15 W |
| Connectivity |
3 HDMI, 2 Peritel, YUV, S-video, Composite, VGA |
| Dimensions (LxHxW) | 100,4 x 70,8 x 35 cm (avec pied) |
| Weight | 26 Kg (avec pied) |
Hide specifications | |
Vincent Lheur
Test date: January 03, 2008
Test date: January 03, 2008

Strange afterglow
The announced response time of 6 ms can be confirmed in practice. Images are sharp and don’t suffer from any afterglow in fast movements. There is actually another artifact effect that occasionally appears: large blocks of very bright colors are sometimes still perceptible a short instant when the image turns black. Unfortunately, this phenomenon couldn’t be systematically reproduced. Either way, we can’t really say this will be bothersome when viewing movies because only some areas on our test patterns were affected.
Actually, this last characteristic was the first thing that we verified and unfortunately we were disappointed. With black stabilized at 0.17 cd/m², white only attained 219 cd/m², thus resulting in a contrast of 1288:1 and far from the expected 2000:1. We were all the more disappointed because this same brand’s Aquos LC-52HD1E lived up to its promises in this area coming close to its announced 2000:1. Either way, this wasn’t that catastrophic and in the end this TV is simply no better or worse than the average.
On the other hand, presettings were very good and don’t need touching up. Colors were quite natural and grays neutral. Only color temperature leans a little towards blue at 9357 K and lowering it results in grays that are too reddish. In the end, we preferred keeping default parameters.

Besides color temperature that is too high (bluish colors), measurements were rather good.
In actual use, we found that the rescaling of SD sources lacked sharpness. This was strange given that the 32 inch panel, a rather "small" size, should have reinforced this characteristic and left us a bit unsatisfied in this area.
(1).jpg)
SD rescaling by our HD player (left) produces a sharper image than that of the TV’s (right)
For HD, all we can say is that it’s nice, sharp and Full HD! However we did wonder if it’s really worth it to invest in such a screen for just a 32 inch. With such a diagonal size, the difference in quality with HD Ready 720p is small and most eyes won’t even notice it. Moreover, this is the reason why most manufacturers only start to offer Full HD 1080p starting at 37 or 40 inches. And we would have to agree with them. Below this size, Full HD 1080p just adds a cost that is only compensated by a small gain in sharpness.
-
Nice deep black color
-
Good contrast
-
Optical audio digital output
-
3 HDMI
-
Little interest in Full HD 1080p at 32 inches
-
Some color artifacts that persist when screen turns black
-
Rescaled SD sources lack a bit of sharpness

This model left a mixed impression. In a larger size it definitely deserves 4 stars, but the 32 inch version is of little interest.
Check out all of our High Tech offers: TV, Computing, Camera, Gaming, Telephony, Blu-Ray DVD on Pixmania





Product Face-Offs


See all specifications
Hide specifications










