
![]() | |||
| Diagonal screen size | 22 pouces | ||
| Type | TN | ||
| Resolution | 1680 x 1050 pixels | ||
| Response time | 3 ms | ||
| Interfaces (HDMI / DVI / VGA / YUV) | NC | ||
See all specifications | |||
| Options | |
| Viewing angles (H/V) | 170°/170° |
Hide specifications | |

The guy in the photo may seem scary but it is indeed him. There is good detail and sharpness. This image is taken directly from MSN Live without rescaling wand we just cut off the edges. There are however some defects: fluidity isn’t perfect, there is a slight delay in display or a light desynchronization of the image and voice, and colors can sometimes be a bit bizarre. On this photo, there is too much red.
For comparison, here is the test card from the very successful Logitech QuickCam Pro 5000 and that of this screen’s webcam.

Test date: July 16, 2007
The 22 inch with the best color fidelity on the market!
But the real nice surprise, even better than its fine ergonomics, was in color rendering. It proved to be even superior to the Samsung 226BW S series. The average difference measured on our 18 standard colors after one hour of warm-up time was only 1.9 (on our test computer equipped with an NVIDIA graphic card and 1.8 on another PC with an ATI). With the 226BW, this figure was 2.1 and on classic models this number is commonly 3.5. A screen can be outright problematic when color differences have results as high as 6 while at less than 2, as is the case here, even professional graphic artists won’t have much to say. To better grasp the difference between a normal product and one which excels in this domain, look at how grays are produced on this VX2255wmb compared to the LG L226WTQ.
While we are still on the subject of colors, there was one defect. Its depth of black was only at 0.35 cd/m², which is more than the 226BW’s measurement. This is in the average but a little disappointing when we wanted total perfection in everything. Very good LCD monitors can attain 0.20 cd/m².
Movies and games
As is generally the case for screens equipped with TN panels, we noticed a significant amount of shimmering and compression defects in movies. Also typical of products with integrated speakers was a poor sound quality. Basses and highs were more or less inexistent but this was no worse (or better) than other monitors that feature this component. For good sound, nothing is like an external speaker set. As for a better image and less shimmering in movies, you will have to put a little distance between yourself and the screen.
Finally, for games we have a classic 5 ms TN panel. This is good and enough 95 % of the time ; however, for on-line game fanatics where there is constant movement and combat, the 226BW is still better. It is noticeably more reactive and for this reason there is less smearing in rapid movements.
Last but not least, ViewSonic was smart enough to offer a zero dead hot or black pixel warranty (dead colored pixels are covered under the classic ISO 13406-2 norm).
So, the question arises which is better: the 226BW (ideally, an S series) or the ViewSonic VX2255wmb ? The first has slightly better reactivity and, some may say, a more attractive design. The second has a base that allows the screen to be rotated and vertically adjusted as well as offering an integrated webcam, perfect colors and a zero hot and black pixel policy. If you aren’t an extreme game fanatic, the ViewSonic VX2255wmb should win your preference.
-
The best colors of all 22 inches
-
Vertically adjustable, rotating, VGA + DVI with HDCP
-
Hot and black pixel warranty
-
Integrated webcam (and is actually good)
-
Design, quality/price ratio
-
5 ms panel. A little less reactive than the Samsung 226BW
-
Black could have been deeper (lower brightness to improve)
-
Lower viewing angle turns black






Product Face-Offs
See all specifications
Hide specifications










