FranceBelgiqueUnited Kingdom
Product Survey: Graphics Cards >
Generic ATI Radeon HD 4830 512 MB
Chip RV770
GPU frequency 575 MHz
Memory quantity 512 Mo
Memory type GDDR3
Memory frequency 900 MHz
See all specifications
Cooler simple-hauteur
Connectors 2x DVI + 1x video
Driver tested Catalyst 8.12 Hot-fix 2
Hide specifications
Régis Jehl
Updated: March 12, 2009 - Test date: February 23, 2009
The card at a glance
For the test we used a Sapphire version 2.0 (as described on the box). This has the usual tech spec for a Radeon HD 4830 but the heatsink is a Sapphire own brand. And very poor quality too, as it is really too noisy. The thermoregulation of the fan fails completely in fact, because there are only two modes: fan off / fan at max. At max, the sound levels get up to 50.2 dB(A)! When idling, the card alternates between the fan off and fan max positions. Enough to drive you mad! The packaging is of reduced size, which is ecological, and there are few accessories: a DVI to VGA adaptor, a DVI to HDMI adaptor, a YUV cable, an RCA adaptor and a CD with the card pilots.
The Radeon HD 4830 is based on the same technology as the Radeon HD 4870 and 4850. The only difference is in terms of the clocks, revised downwards on this model. When you look at the NVIDIA cards, this one can be compared to the GeForce 9800 GTX+ (=GTS 250). The ATI model does pretty well out of the comparison when the texturing filters are activated. Whatever screen is used, both cards are more or less equal, one in front of the other depending on the game. The NVIDIA card is however much better than the Radeon when the filters are disactivated.


You can find our results in the graphics card Face-off

All games that came out in 2008 do ok with the card and it shouldn’t have any major problem with those that come out in 2009, at least if you use a small enough screen (up to 19 inches, 5/4). And if for you, graphics quality is really crucial, and you don’t envisage reducing the graphics options, you’d be better off with another more powerful model. The same goes for those of you who have a large or medium sized screen (20 inches up): when filters are activated, the card is sometimes not sufficient for some particularly demanding games.

Size, energy consumption and noise

At 21 cm, the card is of average size. It shouldn’t be difficult to integrate into your casing then, even if it’s a fairly small one. One single PCI-Express power supply is all that’s needed to plug the card in. Power consumption at rest is excellent at 108 watts. With intense 3D activated, the result is also good at 252 watts on our counter. As our test model does not use a generic cooling system (see inset), we can’t make any remarks on this.

-

Good 3D performance on a small screen

-

Fits into any casing

-

Moderate energy consumption

-

Not adapted to large and medium-sized screens

-

Limited performance with filters activated on very demanding games

A good card for those who want to set themselves up without going bankrupt. Do watch out however, as you’re better off with a small screen if you don’t want to lose out on game detail.
Send to a friend
Return to the Introduction : Product Survey: Graphics Cards

Our RSS News Feeds : 

Add to Netvibes