Iolair M2AABW

![]() | |||
| Diagonal screen size | 20 pouces | ||
| Type | TN | ||
| Resolution | 1680 x 1050 pixels | ||
| Response time | 5 ms | ||
| Interfaces (HDMI / DVI / VGA / YUV) | 0 / 0 / 1 / 0 | ||
See all specifications | |||
| Options | NA |
| Viewing angles (H/V) | 160° / 160° |
Hide specifications | |
Vincent Alzieu
Test date: April 25, 2008
Test date: April 25, 2008

Finishing touches up close
Of course, you cannot see it on the product’s photo but actually this screen has a black matte bezel with glossy bands on the sides, on the lower part of the screen and on the base. As for buttons, they are hidden under the bezel but they remain easily accessible. Directions are given on the front face and are well legible.
Actually, some nice surprises!
In particular, we didn’t expect miracles from its panel whose announced response time is 5 ms. However, in practice it’s better than what monitors of this type usually produce. If we had to put a value to its reactivity, we would say it’s more like a 3 ms with behavior quite close to the most reactive screens on the market , the 2 ms. For this reason, its score, automatically calculated based on our measurements, is halfway between these two categories (a good 2 ms often finishes with 4 stars while a classic 5 ms is at 2 stars). copie.jpg)
It’s the same for colors. We are used to catastrophic rendering on the entry level. Here, it’s not what we could call a calibrated screen, but it’s definitely within reason. The average difference (average dE) between ideal colors and those actually displayed is 4 while no color blows measurements off the charts. To improve these settings, we can still manually decrease default blue levels as color temperature starts off at 7400 Kelvin which is a bit cold. As for the gamma, it’s very good at 2.3 and there is no need for adjustment. Darker zones aren’t saturated and lighter ones aren’t burned out. Do not lower brightness as on our test screen, this only hurt contrast, which was initially quite good (715:1), while not improving depth in black.Its weakness: ergonomics and our first ''zero star'' in this area
Colors and reactivity, two very important areas in tests, are rather good (even if they are inferior to what we find on the slightly more expensive Iiyama E2200WS). So it was in ergonomics that costs were cut and here indeed there isn’t much. There is a VGA input and that’s it.
-
Price
-
Reactivity is better than expected
-
Good colors, even if there was a slight blue dominance
-
No DVI
-
Very basic ergonomics
-
No zero dead pixel policy
-
TN panel = lower viewing angle turns black

This ultra low priced screen was a nice surprise even if for slightly more expensive there is better reactivity, colors and ergonomics, particularly with Iiyama.
Check out all of our High Tech offers: TV, Computing, Camera, Gaming, Telephony, Blu-Ray DVD on Pixmania





Product Face-Offs
See all specifications
Hide specifications










