
| Sensor | CCD 6 mégapixels (1/1.7'') |
| Zoom | 3x (36 - 108 mm) |
| Optical stabilization | Non |
| Internal/external memory | 10 Mo / xD |
| Sensitivity | 100 - 1600 ISO |
| Video mode | 640 x 480 pixels / 30 fps |
| Power source | Batterie lithium-ion |
| Dimensions/Weight | 94 x 57 x 27 mm / 190 g |

Contrary to Canon, notably on its Ixus 800 IS, Fuji has still not added mechanical stabilization to its camera. This manufacturer instead concentrated on noise control with increases in sensitivity, to which more experienced photographers are more concerned.
Therefore, in equal (difficult) conditions the Canon uses a combination of 400 ISO / exposure time of 1/10 second, while the Fuji functions with 1600 ISO and 1/34 s. 400 versus 1600 ISO means the amount of noise should be a lot less with one. But no, the advantage goes to Fuji whose noise at 1600 is quite close to the Canon at 400 ISO.
As for exposure time: there is 1/10 s on one side – if the subject moves it will be blurry as stabilization only corrects the photographer’s movements – and 1/34 s on the other. A time that is three times shorter for Fuji assures more often that subjects will be sharp at the cost of a little more noise than Canon’s result at 400 ISO

Once you have mastered this camera, you can leave the stabilized mode (activated on the lower right side) to manually have a choice of sensitivities with activation of the burst mode in complement. You can then try photos not in 1600 ISO but in 800 ISO. The exposure time is mathematically cut in half as well as the amount of noise. For this reason the resulting photo is more precise as well as having less noise. Either way, you will want to take multiple shots. In the absence of stabilization, the F20 will only be sharp one in every three or four photos once we have set an exposure time between 1/15 s and 1/20 s.
Test date: 2006-11-09

The change between the two last versions is subtle and less radical than between the F11 and F30. If you closely examine the above photo, there is only the small wave that has been added on the left of the objective. It’s just a detail, but it is better.
The other modifications between the F30 and F20 are also as subtle. A millimeter in length was lost in exchange for a little more height. The new battery is slightly less powerful with a 300 photo autonomy versus 500 for the F30). The screen is the same size, but it is not as well defined (we go from 230 000 pixels to 153 000 on the F20). So, here indeed we do have the little brother of the F30. We also find the same 6th generation sensor without stabilization, however, with noise control that is much more efficient than with Canon or Panasonic (this compensates well – see box), the same xD cards (arrgh! slow to transfer photos and expensive), equal burst modes, and video.

In fact, it’s the same camera but a « light » version, however, a good and more economical product. For exactly the same print quality, this F20 is 50 Euros less expensive.
- Very little noise up until 1600 ISO, which compensates perfectly for no stabilization
- Very nice indoor flash photos
- Good macro mode
- Reviewed design since the F11, slightly more attractive than the F30
- 10 MB of internal memory (could be helpful)
- Design still a little less attractive than its Canon and Panasonic rivals
- xD memory cards
- Slow to startup
- In video, zoom is inactive and lacks sharpness







Product face-offs










