Product face-offs
Samsung SyncMaster 225UW
 | |||
| Diagonal screen size | 22 pouces | ||
| Type | TN | ||
| Resolution | 1680 x 1050 pixels | ||
| Response time | 5 ms | ||
| Interfaces (HDMI / DVI / VGA / YUV) | NC | ||
 See all specifications | |||
| Options | |
| Viewing angles (H/V) | 160° / 160° |
 Hide specifications | |
The webcam
Samsung went all out and integrated a high end 2 megapixel webcam. One notable difference between what ViewSonic offers is that the 225UW’s is also vertically adjustable. A last original addition is that the lens is more or less a wide angle. To have a tight image, you only have to be a meter from the screen. Beyond this, you could get lost in the background. The wide angle is practical for conversations if there is more than one person in front of the computer.
As for the actual performance of this component, as you can see from the image it’s of good quality and it can even stand the comparison with pro models. Whites are bright, there is good contrast, however, there are limits in darker tones. As you can see on the test card, these blend together and are indistinguishable causing a noticeable loss of detail in these areas. Finally, for reactivity and as is usually the case rapid movements aren’t the best captured. Rendering is best if you don’t move too much.
Vincent Alzieu
Test date: 2007-08-07
Test date: 2007-08-07
The Samsung SyncMaster 225uw is a 22 inch with an integrated webcam – like on the excellent ViewSonic VX2255wmb. The advantage of the Samsung is that it has a 2 port USB hub which is very practical for connecting a mouse, USB key or card reader. We also appreciated the monitor’s design, nice lacquer finish (which is so much the current trend), and reactive buttons.
Note: If you consult the specifications on Samsung’s website, contrary to what is stated, it is not 22 inch 1400 x 900 pixel, but a 1650 x 1080 monitor as is listed elsewhere on the site.
Strong points? Viewing angles and color rendering...according to Samsung.
In this screen’s marketing brochure or that which was conceived to give arguments to sales people, Samsung emphasizes three main characteristics:
Viewing angles: it states 170° in the vertical plane, however, we really wonder where they obtained this value. Here is what we have at just 100°. At 170° we don’t even show you...
Reading a little further, Samsung mentions the particularly fast response time of 5 ms. This is satisfactory but it’s also what is the current slowest - all technologies included. In practice, this 5 ms turns out to be less reactive than the 6 ms of PVA panels and 8 ms MVAs. It’s good enough for normal use, however, nothing to write home about.
Finally and even more misguided, Samsung sings praise for its colors thanks to a component called the MagicColor Chip. Actually, if we were really to be mean we could say that their diagram is much better the actual results:
Before this processing, colors could have been good, a bit bland but at least natural. However, Samsung opted for special processing that is supposed to make colors ‘’sublime’’ – at least in their brochure – but which actually over-saturates and burns them out. In the end, this isn’t that catastrophic but it isn’t great either. The average difference between perfect colors and those displayed on the screen is 6.3, a result that we typically found two years ago. These days better performances of some monitors arrive at a value of around 2. Here, the difference is blatant and translates into a very noticeable blue dominance accentuated by a lack of red. It can only help to try and manually compensate for this in the OSD menu of the screen.
Note: If you consult the specifications on Samsung’s website, contrary to what is stated, it is not 22 inch 1400 x 900 pixel, but a 1650 x 1080 monitor as is listed elsewhere on the site.
Strong points? Viewing angles and color rendering...according to Samsung.
In this screen’s marketing brochure or that which was conceived to give arguments to sales people, Samsung emphasizes three main characteristics:
Viewing angles: it states 170° in the vertical plane, however, we really wonder where they obtained this value. Here is what we have at just 100°. At 170° we don’t even show you...
Reading a little further, Samsung mentions the particularly fast response time of 5 ms. This is satisfactory but it’s also what is the current slowest - all technologies included. In practice, this 5 ms turns out to be less reactive than the 6 ms of PVA panels and 8 ms MVAs. It’s good enough for normal use, however, nothing to write home about.
Finally and even more misguided, Samsung sings praise for its colors thanks to a component called the MagicColor Chip. Actually, if we were really to be mean we could say that their diagram is much better the actual results:
Before this processing, colors could have been good, a bit bland but at least natural. However, Samsung opted for special processing that is supposed to make colors ‘’sublime’’ – at least in their brochure – but which actually over-saturates and burns them out. In the end, this isn’t that catastrophic but it isn’t great either. The average difference between perfect colors and those displayed on the screen is 6.3, a result that we typically found two years ago. These days better performances of some monitors arrive at a value of around 2. Here, the difference is blatant and translates into a very noticeable blue dominance accentuated by a lack of red. It can only help to try and manually compensate for this in the OSD menu of the screen.
-
Good quality webcam
-
VGA + DVI with HDCP
-
Integrated USB Hub
-
Preset colors
-
Base isn’t vertically adjustable unlike its ViewSonic rival
-
Lower viewing angle darkens quickly
-
5 ms panel is a little less reactive than the Samsung 226BW
-
No zero dead pixel policy contrary to ViewSonic
The duel between the Samsung 225UW and ViewSonic VX2255wmb clearly has turned to the advantage of the second because it’s less expensive (the Samsung is at roughly 400 Euros), has better color fidelity, a vertically adjustable base, and zero dead pixel warranty.
